Ranking Americas' Best
   Professional Golf Players
What needs to be done to bring the Champions Tour back to former grandeur?

1/21/07
The 2006 sponsor for the Grand Masters did not renew their sponsorship. The PGA has not been able to find a replacement for 2007 or 2008. We however, will continue our Championship.  Please help us find a sponsor.
Use email to contact us.
1. We will only use all events on the champions tour played in the US.
2. We will only use the first two rounds irregardless of the actual number of rounds un the event.
3. We will use the actual prize money won.
We have 56 names on our list, We expect 36-40 to participate is some events.
 Lets give them a big round of applause!

Problem   10/11/06   Solutions           Chart

From the GolfHelp newsletter #339 8/23/06:
John Hawkins (golfworld.com) (Golf Digest family of magazines) pointed out last week how few viewers are watching Champions Tour events on The Golf Channel. He placed the figure at 100,000 households per round. Compare that to the LPGA's 66.3 ratings increase over last year on TGC, and you are witnessing what amounts to a massive downturn in one instance and a whopping increase in the other. Is there a turn that can divert the Champions Tour from a path to oblivion? So far no has drawn the map.

Major golf magazines should not emphasize the negative for sensationalism. They should take a positive approach to fix the problem. Since no one has objected, we have decided to fight for the Champions Tout.

Here is the map!
This Tour is very important to golf. It shows our respect for great players of the past. No other sport does this. This a great example for our children.
Has the Tour lost some steam? Yes!

Problem #1
It has dropped from 47 events a few tears back to the 29 we have today.
Why?
The basic problem is the purse distribution. It is atrocious. I have a chart at the bottom of this page that shows how bad it is. The 70th place player gets about a third of what a PGA Tour player gets for the same purse and the purses are half the size. Who wants to take money out of their pocket to play for a $800.00 prize.

Yes, it does pay just slightly more than the PGA Tour through the 50th place, but then it drops like a rock.

Because of this the Grand Masters who made this Tour great 10 years ago are not playing.

Problem #2.
When the great players started playing less and less , the Tour lost it's major network foundation.
Why?
What I read and hear is that the Tour is set up to cater to the top 50 players and  makes it hard for the rest to get in.

Solutions:

Solution #1
Change the purse distribution so there is an incentive for the Seniors to play. Our PGR100 would be a good choice. First place is 25%  higher for the same purse. It does take some money from 4th through 45th (this is the range with the greatest number of ties) and spreads it out from 46 through 100. Downside, yes, 4th through 20th take about a 25% hit. This is an incentive to play better to get out of a tie. This should also cure the complain on the golf forums that the players don't seem to go for the better score when they are capable of doing so. The spread between 1st and 4th jumps by $100,200.00 on a $2,000,000 purse. However, it pays about the same at position 100 as the PGA purse distribution does at 70th place.
 All you do is adjust the first place position 25%  higher to maintain the same purse size.
When you look at the distribution curves you will see that this is extremely fair.

Solution #2
There are about 150 members of the Champions Tour. However, only about 115 are active. Let the field size grow to accommodate as many of the members that want to, play. With a purse distributed to a 100 players, that pays a decent amount, we will bring them all back. Let them all play the first two rounds and have a cut to 70 players on Sunday. This gives us a chance to see all our old favorites. This would be especially beneficial to the Grand Masters who really made the Champions Tour such a great event 10 years ago..
Close the Tour events to members only. About 23% of the players are non members and only account for less than 4% of rounds played.. The exemptions could be used to pull in any past Superstars that are no longer members. Non members are ok for the PGA Tour and essential for the Nationwide tour, but Champions Tour players have earned the right not to compete with non members for this purse. This is fair because the non members have the PGA Senior Championship and the U.S. and British Opens to play in, which is what they do now.

Some other recommendations.

1. Parings of the first two rounds should be taken from the official money list for Champions Tour  members.

2. Make a big deal out of the Grand Masters. They should always be paired together and start as pair number 5. I count 55 Grand Masters, but only about 31 would be considered active, with 31 in our top 100 players.

Purse Distribution Percentage for chart below.
The PGR 100 purse distribution is a 60/40 split of first for 2nd and third and then you divide first place by player position for the rest.

PGR 100 PGA   70 Seniors78 Nationwide
1 0.18677 0.18000 0.15000 0.18000
2 0.11206 0.10800 0.08800 0.10800
3 0.07471 0.06800 0.07200 0.06800
4 0.04669 0.04800 0.06000 0.04800
5 0.03735 0.04000 0.04800 0.03800
6 0.03113 0.03600 0.04000 0.03600
7 0.02668 0.03350 0.03600 0.03350
8 0.02335 0.03100 0.03200 0.03100
9 0.02075 0.02900 0.02800 0.02900
10 0.01868 0.02700 0.02600
11 0.01698 0.02500 0.02400
12 0.01556 0.02300 0.02200 0.02300
13 0.01437 0.02100 0.02000
14 0.01334 0.01900 0.01900
15 0.01245 0.01800 0.01800
16 0.01167 0.01700 0.01700 0.01700
17 0.01099 0.01600 0.01600
18 0.01038 0.01500 0.01500
19 0.00983 0.01400 0.01410
20 0.00934 0.01300 0.01320 0.01300
21 0.00889 0.01200 0.01240
22 0.00849 0.01120 0.01160
23 0.00812 0.01040 0.01100
24 0.00778 0.00960 0.01050
25 0.00747 0.00880 0.01000
26 0.00718 0.00800 0.00950
27 0.00692 0.00770 0.00910
28 0.00667 0.00740 0.00870
29 0.00644 0.00710 0.00830
30 0.00623 0.00680 0.00790 0.00680
31 0.00602 0.00650 0.00750
32 0.00584 0.00620 0.00720
33 0.00566 0.00590 0.00690
34 0.00549 0.00565 0.00660
35 0.00534 0.00540 0.00630
36 0.00519 0.00515 0.00600
37 0.00505 0.00490 0.00570
38 0.00492 0.00470 0.00550
39 0.00479 0.00450 0.00530
40 0.00467 0.00430 0.00510 0.00480
41 0.00456 0.00410 0.00490
42 0.00445 0.00390 0.00470
43 0.00434 0.00370 0.00450
44 0.00424 0.00350 0.00430
45 0.00415 0.00330 0.00410
46 0.00406 0.00310 0.00390
47 0.00397 0.00290 0.00370
48 0.00389 0.00274 0.00350 0.00360
49 0.00381 0.00260 0.00330
50 0.00374 0.00252 0.00310 0.00350
51 0.00366 0.00246 0.00290
52 0.00359 0.00240 0.00270 0.00340
53 0.00352 0.00236 0.00250 0.00335
54 0.00346 0.00232 0.00240
55 0.00340 0.00230 0.00230 0.00325
56 0.00334 0.00228 0.00220 0.00320
57 0.00328 0.00226 0.00210 0.00315
58 0.00322 0.00224 0.00200 0.00310
59 0.00317 0.00222 0.00190 0.00305
60 0.00311 0.00220 0.00180 0.00300
61 0.00306 0.00218 0.00170 0.00295
62 0.00301 0.00216 0.00160 0.00290
63 0.00296 0.00214 0.00150 0.00285
64 0.00292 0.00212 0.00140 0.00280
65 0.00287 0.00210 0.00130 0.00275
66 0.00283 0.00208 0.00120 0.00270
67 0.00279 0.00206 0.00110 0.00265
68 0.00275 0.00204 0.00100 0.00260
69 0.00271 0.00202 0.00094 0.00255
70 0.00267 0.00200 0.00088 0.00260
71 0.00263 0.00082 0.00245
72 0.00259 0.00076 0.00240
73 0.00256 0.00070 0.00235
74 0.00252 0.00066 0.00230
75 0.00249 0.00062
76 0.00246 0.00058 0.00220
77 0.00243 0.00054
78 0.00239 0.00050
79 0.00236 0.00046
80 0.00233 0.00042
81 0.00231 0.00040
82 0.00228
83 0.00225
84 0.00222
85 0.00220
86 0.00217
87 0.00215
88 0.00212
89 0.00210
90 0.00208
91 0.00205
92 0.00203
93 0.00201
94 0.00199
95 0.00197
96 0.00195
97 0.00193
98 0.00191
99 0.00189
100 0.00187

Here is link to purse distribution we did for the year 2002. Notice how similar our curve was then.

Home
Why PGR
Rankings
Events
Purses
Scoring 
Changing Golf
Equipment Ranking Rating Field strengths

Email This Golf Website To A Friend

Be a Sponsor or a
Media Partner of a Pro Golf Ranking
Iron Championship

Purse Distribution Chart for four types of distribution
Percent of Toal Purse versus Player Position
Back top of problem.

About Us | Links | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Comments | Top of Page

Copyright (c)  2003-2007 progolfrankings.com, all rights reserved.
All trademarks belong to their respective owners.
Last updated Thursday, July 12, 2007