````````````````
Ranking Americas' Best
   Professional Golf Players
What is the participation level of the players?
Both Tours started season long points systems hoping to increase participation of big name players. 
Here's how they are doing. 

LPGA

PGA

Charts
1/24/07
The LPGA was the first tour to set up some sort of season long points system in an effort to increase the participation of the top players. In our opinion it is kind of clunky and does not work well. According to our data for 2006 it has not changed anything!
Participation percentage of top 100 players in all regular season events by:
As you can see by the numbers, no matter how you count them, participation of top players in the LPGA has gone down and the number of players has increased.

We will provide new table at end of year.

We are not making a separate percentage chart for the  LPGA because their participation levels has always been so consistent year to year. We will make one after the season for all players.
This is a reflection of what we observed in 2006. Once a player knew she was in the championship, there was no need to compete every week. And certainly no need to compete in the second half and travel over seas. We noticed a distinct drop in participation in the second half of US based players. We don't blame the players, there is just not enough prize money to justify the travel. 

We have a chart that shows the number of total player participation through each event for these years. 
Click here for LPGA total participation 

We also have a summary chart that shows how many players played in a certain number of events.
Click here for LPGA event count..   

Charts
1/25/07
The PGA set up the FedEx Cup to increase participation of the top players. We have determined that That the top 125 players are the ones that are going to determine if strategy is going to work. To that end we have now created a chart to give a visual look at whether or not the top 125 players have increased their percent participation. We will up date this after every event. We averaged 2005 2006 to get a comparison line. We used the average because there was so little difference between 2005 and 2006 the lines would have been on top of each other. We have data both for our PGR ranking and by money won.
To see chart click here. 

As you can see by the numbers, no matter how you count them, participation of top players in the PGA has been substantially less than the LPGA.
It will be interesting to see how they compare as this year goes on.

We had estimated last year that there would be 250 full PGA members who would qualify for FedEx Cup points. We were wrong. There are 299 full members. We also estimated in the same page we lose some 350 non-members. That is now revised, we expect to lose some 300 non-members and 160 members will not make any significant money.

We have a chart that shows the number of total player participation through each event for these years. 
Click here for PGA total participation chart.

What can be done?

They should use our ranking system for the entire season. This would require greater participation of the players. Instead of two halves use the US versus the international like we already have. If they think big enough, they have the seeds for the first world wide playoffs between tours.

What else is going to be affected?

The number of events a player participates in. We have a summary chart that shows how many players played in a certain number of events.
Click here for PGA event count chart.

The whole underlying idea of these points systems is to put on a better show by having the better players  play more often. Conversely with the better players using their exemptions to get into an event this reduces the number of the occasional "unknown" who gets in because no one else came to play. Both tours use an official money list that that is for members only. They therefore hide the winnings of the non members.  Our data shows everyone. Thus we can make charts that show the total numbers of players at different prize levels as the year goes on. This tells us whether or not the tours are successful in reducing the number of occasional players and getting the big names to show up.
The LPGA has 197 on their money list for 2006 with a median of $76,717, we have 297 with a median of $32,036. Our chart show this total and the number at $30,000, $100,000 and $300,000 or more. Click here for chart.
As you can see from all these charts the ADT points system has failed to accomplish this goal.
The PGA has 263 with a median prize of $601,928 on their 2006 money list and we have 364 with a median of $304,196. Therefore it seemed reasonable to show the total number of players as the year progressed and the number of players making at least $100,000, $300,000 and those that made over a million. Click here for chart

Home
Why PGR
Rankings
Events
Purses
Scoring
Changing Golf
Equipment Ranking Rating Field strengths

Email This Golf Website To A Friend

Be a Sponsor or a
Media Partner of a Pro Golf Ranking
Iron Championship



About Us | Links | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Comments | Top of Page

Copyright (c) 2003, Copyright (c) 2006 Option Services for Commodities, Inc. all rights reserved.
All trademarks belong to their respective owners.
Last updated Thursday, July 12, 2007
The names of events, tours and prizes are either copyrighted or  trademarked and belong to their respective owner.
None of them endorse or sanction these rankings.`